In the last few days of February 2026, the Nigerian entertainment and social commentary scene has been gripped by a heated and complex feud involving social critic VeryDarkMan, popularly known as VDM, on one side, and King Mitchy, a rising public personality, alongside Seyi Tinubu, a politically connected figure, on the other.
The conflict is more than a personal disagreement; it has morphed into a multi layered online and offline controversy, touching on allegations of political influence, public funding, personal threats, and social credibility.
While many social media users have taken sides, the situation remains difficult to fully disentangle because a combination of leaked videos, alleged private chats, viral clips, and public statements have fueled a continuous cycle of accusation and counter accusation.
The Origin of the Feud
The origins of the clash can be traced to public criticism from King Mitchy directed at VeryDarkMan regarding school renovation projects that had been publicly funded. In early January 2026, King Mitchy issued comments through her social media handles and in local interviews suggesting that VDM was more focused on talking about action than actually executing meaningful projects. She criticized what she described as performative activism, implying that the projects did not reflect the full promise of accountability to the public.
VDM responded with his own videos in which he accused King Mitchy of having political motivations behind her statements. He specifically claimed that her activities were linked to Seyi Tinubu, alleging financial support for renovations that might be politically timed ahead of the 2027 elections. These exchanges quickly escalated, drawing large numbers of followers and critics into online debates that transformed personal disagreements into public spectacle.
Leaked Chats and Screenshots
Amid the intensifying feud, several alleged private chats and screenshots began to circulate on social media. King Mitchy reportedly shared screenshots of conversations between herself and Seyi Tinubu. The stated purpose of these screenshots was to demonstrate direct contact with him and to defend herself against VDM’s accusations of undue political influence. While the authenticity of these chats was not independently verified, their appearance online caused a surge in public speculation. Nigerians discussed and debated the implications of such contact, the nature of the messages, and whether they indicated backing that would validate VDM’s claims.
In addition, King Mitchy circulated alleged WhatsApp messages with Oba Adeyeye Ogunwusi, the Ooni of Ife. These messages purportedly praised her work and added a cultural endorsement to her public image. However, within days, representatives from the Ooni’s palace publicly refuted the messages, declaring them false and warning the public against spreading misinformation. This part of the feud attracted significant backlash because it involved dragging a respected traditional ruler into a dispute that had largely been perceived as social commentary or political rivalry.
The mixture of alleged authenticity and clear refutation created confusion among the public, with many questioning which sources could be trusted and how far the feud might extend beyond personalities into cultural and political territories.
Viral Videos and Old Footage
Just few hours ago, an old video of VeryDarkMan resurfaced showing him expressing past support for Seyi Tinubu in a political context. The video was originally recorded years earlier but gained sudden relevance in the context of the ongoing feud. Many Nigerians were surprised because the clip suggested that Verydarkman had previously endorsed Tinubu’s political ambitions, even as he was accusing Seyi of financially backing King Mitchy in the present scenario. The resurfacing of this old footage shifted the narrative, raising questions about political consistency, past alliances, and the interplay between private opinions and public accusations.
Shortly after, VDM released a viral emotional video in which he claimed that he had received threats to his life linked to the feud. In the video, he explicitly mentioned King Mitchy and Seyi Tinubu as individuals who would be held responsible if anything happened to him or to associates close to him.
He described specific messages and calls that he alleged warned friends of “something heavy” coming for him. The video attracted widespread attention and concern, escalating the stakes of the feud beyond online disputes to matters perceived by many as personal safety. Social media engagement spiked, with users debating whether these claims were authentic, exaggerated, or politically motivated.
Allegations of Funding and Financial Influence
Central to VDM’s allegations is the claim that Seyi Tinubu has been financially supporting King Mitchy. VDM portrayed this alleged sponsorship as evidence that King Mitchy’s social influence, charitable initiatives, and public persona were instruments of political interest. He framed her as a tool in a broader elite strategy designed to influence public perception and garner support for future political ambitions.
King Mitchy, in turn, shifted her narrative publicly. She suggested that large donations, including a claimed sum of ₦100 million, were primarily intended for publicity purposes rather than direct political endorsement. She consistently defended the legitimacy of her projects and insisted that funding sources were lawful and transparent. The divergence of claims added layers of complexity to the narrative, prompting observers to question the extent to which social media activism in Nigeria can be entangled with elite financial influence. The discussion extended beyond personalities to a broader examination of how social projects and philanthropy intersect with politics and personal branding.
Political Undercurrents and the Question of Influence
Beneath the surface of social media arguments lay a layer of political tension that heightened the stakes of the feud. VDM’s allegations that King Mitchy received financial support from Seyi Tinubu were interpreted not merely as personal attacks but as commentary on elite influence and political patronage.
Observers noted that the timing of King Mitchy’s school renovation projects — coming ahead of the 2027 elections — added a political dimension to the dispute. Conversely, King Mitchy framed the donations she received as intended for publicity and community impact, challenging the idea that her actions were politically orchestrated.
This tug-of-war over interpretation sparked debates about the intersection of philanthropy, celebrity, and politics, raising larger questions about whether public social initiatives can ever be truly independent when high profile figures are involved.
Dramatic Viral Videos and “Hypo” Self-Harm Claims
In the most recent developments in the feud between VeryDarkMan, King Mitchy, and Seyi Tinubu, a series of alarming and conflicting social media posts sent shockwaves across Nigeria’s digital space. Viral reports emerged claiming that King Mitchy had allegedly consumed a harmful household substance — commonly referred to in Nigeria as “hypo” — during a live video amid her ongoing online clash with VDM, purportedly leading to her death.
Within hours of that post appearing on news aggregation sites and social networks, VDM’s team then released a separate announcement claiming that he too had died, using a graphic that showed his birth and death years alongside an image of a coffin.
The rapid succession of alleged “death” announcements created widespread confusion, alarm, and emotional responses from followers, family members, and the general public but there was no independent verification from official sources confirming either reported death. Many Nigerians online swiftly began questioning whether the incidents were genuine tragedies or merely staged publicity stunts meant to amplify the feud and drive engagement.
The confusion over King Mitchy’s condition intensified after certain online posts claimed she had been rushed to a hospital in Abuja and was later discharged alive, even as other outlets shared contradictory headlines suggesting she had passed away following the live video.
One X user pointed out that the earlier viral reports were “pure lies” until confirmed by official parties, and warned against taking unverified rumours at face value. There were also calls telling people not to resort to consuming dangerous substances over online drama — advice that underscored the risk of misinformation and the very real human consequences that can arise when social media conflicts are sensationalised
Hidden Signals, Digital Footprints, and the Clues Shaping Public Interpretation
Looking at the entire saga involving VeryDarkMan, King Mitchy, and references to Seyi Tinubu, the strongest clues point less to a hidden criminal conspiracy and more to a highly strategic digital power struggle driven by narrative control, reputation management, and influence preservation.
The first major clue is timing. Every explosive development seems to arrive precisely when one side is under reputational pressure. The resurfaced old endorsement video appeared when political funding allegations were gaining traction. The hypo self harm drama surfaced at a peak emotional moment in the feud. The death announcement graphic followed closely behind. This pattern suggests calculated escalation rather than coincidence. In conflicts where timing repeatedly aligns with reputational damage control, it signals strategy.
The second clue is selective evidence. Screenshots were partial. Chats were cropped. Context was missing. No full conversation exports were provided. When evidence is consistently incomplete yet presented as definitive, it indicates narrative shaping. Genuine transparency usually involves full records, not fragments designed to support a specific claim.
The third clue is institutional silence. There has been no verified hospital confirmation regarding the alleged hypo ingestion. There has been no public police documentation of reported threats. There has been no formal legal action disclosed at the height of the allegations. In cases involving real harm or credible threats, official channels typically leave a trace. The absence of that trace is significant.
The fourth clue is theatrical presentation. The pre designed death graphic, the emotionally framed accountability statements, and the dramatic camera angles in the viral videos reflect performance awareness. These were not accidental recordings. They were staged for maximum emotional and viral impact. That suggests the primary battlefield is public perception rather than legal reality.
The fifth clue is motive consistency. At its core, the feud revolves around influence, funding, and credibility. VDM positions himself as a watchdog against elite manipulation. King Mitchy positions herself as a legitimate social actor unfairly targeted. The political undertone involving Seyi Tinubu adds gravity. When reputation and political perception intersect, the incentive to dominate narrative becomes extremely high.
Taken together, the clues suggest this saga is less about immediate physical danger and more about power, optics, and digital dominance. It appears to be a high stakes social media war where emotional shock, leaked material, and public sympathy are tactical tools. The real contest is credibility in the court of public opinion.
That is the clearest pattern emerging from the noise.
An Open-Ended Saga and National Attention
The feud shows no signs of resolution, with new videos, alleged chats, and statements continuously fueling public discussion. Both VDM and King Mitchy remain active online, reinforcing their narratives and engaging audiences in a cycle of accusation and defense. While some observers anticipate possible legal involvement, others predict the feud will continue as a sustained social media phenomenon. Its persistence highlights the power of digital platforms in shaping public discourse, influencing perception, and mediating reputational conflicts in ways previously unimaginable.
The story is ongoing, and it serves as a study of celebrity culture, political entanglements, and the ways in which human behavior, ethical dilemmas, and digital influence intersect in contemporary society, making it a case that will likely be analyzed for its cultural, political, and social ramifications for years to come.
Discussion about this post