On Monday, the Labour Party (LP) and its presidential candidate in the February 25 general elections, Peter Obi, accused the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) of refusing to provide the documents required to prove their joint petition challenging Bola Tinubu’s election victory.
During the petition’s resumed hearing, the petitioners’ counsel, Jibrin Okutepa (SAN), informed the court of their inability to obtain the documents they needed in their case from the electoral body, despite several letters to that effect.
This segment is to formally bring to the notice of the court, the excruciating experience we are having from INEC”, Okutepa said and added that the electoral body released only a few documents to the petitioners on Monday afternoon.
We have done everything humanly possible, including persuasion and letter writing. We decide to seek the help of the court”, he said and further informed that the petitioners received a few copies of I-ReV reports from a few Local Government Areas of Lagos that were certified on May 29 by INEC which refused to make them available to the petitioners.
We have consistently written letters to INEC, including the one I wrote personally on May 20 detailing all the documents we wanted”, Okutepa said and told the court that INEC refused service of subpoena from the bailiff of the court.
This proceeding is time-bound. We have paid for the documents and INEC is supposed to give us the documents that we need. We are crying to your Lordship as we have nowhere to run to. It appears that INEC is deliberately frustrating the proceedings, Okutepa told the court.
Counsel to INEC, Abubakar Mahmoud (SAN) disagreed with the submissions of the counsel to the petitioners, adding that the petitioners’ counsel did not discuss any issue with him before the commencement of the Monday proceedings.
He said;
There is no reason to deny Labour Party any document, saying, there are procedures for obtaining documents from INEC.
They didn’t want to follow the procedures. Am taken aback by the submissions of Okutepa. We can’t sit here and be hearing lamentation that is unfounded”, he said and noted that he had replied to the letter written to him by the lead counsel to the petitioners, Dr. Livy Uzoukwu (SAN).
Earlier, the petitioners called Mpeh Clarita Ogar, a cloud engineer and architect currently employed by Amazon Web Services Incorporated, as their seventh witness.
The witness adopted her witness statement on oath deposed to on June 19 at the registry of the court, led in evidence by Counsel to the petitioners, Patrick Ikwueto (SAN).
A copy of the witness’s resume, an appointment letter from Amazon Web Services Incorporated, and six volumes of reports from the 33 regions where Amazon Web Services hosts their servers.
According to Ikwueto, the report on the health status of the AWS cloud services in the region revealed no technical issues on February 25, 2023.
Despite INEC’s objections to their admissibility, the court admitted the documents as exhibits. Tinubu and the APC, who are respondents in the CA/PEPC/03/2023.
The Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC) sitting in Abuja, led by Justice Haruna Tsammani, adjourned until Tuesday, June 20 for cross-examination of the 7th petitioners’ witness and continuation of the hearing.
Discussion about this post