Smoke still curls from the outskirts of a village in Kwara State. Ashes mix with the morning mist, and the smell of burnt homes hangs in the air. Mothers clutch their children while searching for neighbors who never returned. Fathers pace through fields once filled with crops, now trampled and scarred. The sound of silence is heavy, broken only by the faint cries of those trying to make sense of the chaos that descended without warning. Nearly 200 lives were lost in these attacks, leaving a community suspended between grief and disbelief. Across Nigeria, similar scenes play out, but official reactions remain muted. Statements are released, condolences expressed, yet the people are left to endure the consequences of inaction.
It is in this context that Folarin Falana, popularly known as Falz, steps forward in February 8th 2026 with a voice that cuts through the quiet despair. Known for speaking boldly on social and political issues, the rapper and activist did not hesitate to confront the uncomfortable truths about leadership, security, and the complicity of institutions that are meant to protect and guide the people. In a recent public statement, he articulated frustrations shared by countless Nigerians.
Falz’s words do not merely criticize; they capture a moment in Nigeria’s unfolding story of insecurity, systemic inaction, and the intersection of faith and politics. They set the stage for a deeper examination of what it means to live in a country where violence, governance failures, and political campaigns collide within the same spaces meant for protection and spiritual reflection.
Government Silence and the Limits of Words
Falz’s criticism extended beyond pointing out statistics or deaths; it struck at the very heart of government inaction. He questioned the effectiveness of routine statements that express sadness while failing to deliver meaningful change. Leadership, he argued, must go beyond symbolic gestures and provide accountability.
“Bro, who has been arrested? Who has been prosecuted for this? Nobody. Nothing. Just carry on. You’re always sending people. What are they doing? Nothing. They’re killing scores and scores of people every day,” he emphasized.
These lines reflect the frustration of a public that expects leadership to act decisively rather than issue statements that do little to prevent further tragedies. Falz’s critique highlights the consequences of repeated inaction: citizens grow resigned, and violence becomes a recurring headline without consequences.
This critique also raises questions about the efficacy of government deployments and interventions. Sending officials to affected regions is meaningless if their presence does not translate into actionable results.
According to Falz, the repeated lack of arrests or prosecutions signals systemic failure, where political processes and security structures are incapable or unwilling to protect citizens. This situation fosters widespread cynicism and public fatigue, as ordinary Nigerians watch armed groups continue to kill and destroy with little fear of reprisal.
Religious Institutions and Spiritual Solutions
Falz’s statement moved beyond governance to address the role of religious institutions in shaping public perception and behavior. He noted that citizens often turn to churches for guidance and protection during crises, but religious leaders, in his view, sometimes focus exclusively on prayer while avoiding political awareness or civic responsibility. He said, “But today, people will go to church. Your religious leader, Daddy GO, Papa, he will tell you to sit down there and pray. Pray that God will come and save you.” This critique illustrates a tension between faith and action, suggesting that while spiritual guidance may comfort individuals, it cannot replace the need for societal accountability, justice, or active civic engagement.
Falz argued that the absence of discussion around political issues within religious spaces allows structural problems to persist. Prayer alone cannot stop mass killings, address insecurity, or ensure accountability. By pointing to this dynamic, Falz emphasized the need for citizens to engage critically with both spiritual guidance and political realities. Religious leaders, according to him, carry responsibility not just for spiritual welfare but also for fostering awareness about governance, security, and civic rights.
Political Campaigns in Churches
A significant concern for Falz is the political use of church platforms. He highlighted that politicians have begun campaigning even amid rising insecurity, gaining legitimacy through access to religious congregations.
Falz stated, “They’ve started campaigning for the next elections. Quote, unquote, ‘Relax, Tinubu is fixing Nigeria.’ Tinubu is fixing Nigeria. He is? Okay. They’ve announced coordinator for the east, for the west, for the south. Now, these guys will still go to these same churches. And your papa, your daddy GO, will allow them on the pulpit to campaign to you. And he will convince you that you should vote for this same evil. And you too, in the same cycle, in the same pattern that we’ve used for years, you too, you will follow suit and you will vote.”
This sequence highlights a cyclical pattern where political actors exploit religious influence to secure electoral support, often without facing scrutiny for governance failures or insecurity. Falz sees this as a problem not only of leadership but of the broader social ecosystem, where spiritual authority and political power intersect to influence public behavior. By allowing politicians to campaign from pulpits, religious leaders inadvertently contribute to a culture in which accountability is undermined and cycles of governance failure continue unchallenged.
Electoral Reform and Civic Awareness
Falz also drew attention to systemic electoral weaknesses, specifically the Senate’s refusal to adopt measures for real-time transmission of election results.
He noted, “Papa did not tell you that currently the Senate is refusing to adopt the resolution amending the Electoral Act to allow for real-time transmission of election results because they know it will not allow them to be able to rig elections. Papa will not tell you that one. Papa will just tell you to sit down there and wait and pray for a spiritual solution. No problem. Let’s be waiting….”
This statement connects the lack of electoral transparency to the broader themes of inaction and political manipulation. Falz suggests that citizens remain uninformed about reforms that could strengthen democracy and reduce corruption, leaving them vulnerable to repeated cycles of manipulation and disenfranchisement.
By raising these points, Falz highlights the interconnected nature of insecurity, governance failures, religious influence, and electoral shortcomings. He urges citizens to recognize that while spiritual engagement is important, it cannot replace active political participation or demand for accountability. Civic awareness, transparency in elections, and structural reforms are necessary to break cycles of impunity and ensure that leaders are held responsible for their actions.
Call for Civic Engagement and Accountability
Ultimately, Falz’s critique is a call to action for Nigerians to break free from cycles of complacency. He emphasizes that citizens must engage politically, demand justice for victims of violence, and insist on accountability from both leaders and religious institutions. Falz presents a vision of a society in which spiritual guidance coexists with civic responsibility, where prayer is complemented by informed action, and where political structures are held accountable for the protection of citizens. His statement underscores that hope cannot rely solely on divine intervention; it must be reinforced by active participation, vigilance, and insistence on justice in all spheres of national life.
Through this sequence of observations, Falz paints a picture of a country grappling with complex and intertwined challenges. Rising insecurity, leadership inaction, exploitation of religious platforms, and electoral weaknesses are not isolated phenomena but interconnected issues that demand comprehensive solutions. His words resonate as a reminder that citizens, leaders, and institutions must collectively address these challenges, or risk perpetuating cycles of violence and systemic failure for generations to come.
Citizens’ Frustration and Resilience
Despite the hardships, communities exhibit remarkable resilience. Families rebuild homes, neighbors share food, and local networks provide support where government action has failed. Falz’s words capture both frustration and hope, urging citizens to recognize their agency:
“Papa will just tell you to sit down there and wait and pray for a spiritual solution. No problem. Let’s be waiting.” While he critiques passive reliance on prayer alone, he also implies that awakening civic consciousness is a form of empowerment.
Citizens are being called to participate actively, to demand justice, and to insist on reform in governance and security systems. Interviews with survivors reveal a nuanced understanding of the situation. Many express anger toward political leaders and faith institutions, yet they also cling to belief in collective action.
Local groups organize neighborhood watches, liaise with security personnel, and advocate for better response mechanisms. These efforts demonstrate that while systemic failures persist, citizens are capable of driving change when given knowledge, platforms, and support.
The Bigger Picture — Patterns Across Nigeria
The situation in Kwara is not unique. Across northern and central Nigeria, similar patterns emerge: mass killings, government inaction, political campaigns in religious spaces, and weak electoral oversight. Falz situates Kwara within this broader context, emphasizing that what happens there is indicative of nationwide challenges. By linking insecurity, political manipulation, and religious complicity, he offers a lens through which to understand recurring crises.
His critique also draws attention to the psychological toll on citizens. Repeated exposure to violence, coupled with unfulfilled promises from leaders, fosters despair, mistrust, and political apathy. For activists, artists, and concerned citizens, the question becomes how to break these cycles. Falz’s statements resonate precisely because they articulate a frustration that has been simmering for years, now intensified by recent tragic events.
Falz’s Call to Action
Falz’s ultimate message is a call for civic awakening, accountability, and active engagement. He urges Nigerians to move beyond passive prayer and demand structural reforms in governance and electoral systems. His critique blends spiritual awareness with political literacy, recognizing that the two need not be in opposition. By drawing attention to leadership failures, the exploitation of religious platforms, and the vulnerabilities in electoral systems, Falz challenges citizens to assert their agency.
The warning is clear: without vigilance, participation, and insistence on accountability, cycles of violence, manipulation, and impunity will continue. Faith, while important, cannot substitute for action. Prayer alone will not rebuild communities, enforce laws, or prevent mass killings. Falz presents a vision in which citizens are spiritually grounded but politically active, demanding justice while advocating for systemic change.
Discussion about this post