Femi Adesina, President Muhammdu Buhari’s Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, has attacked the Catholic Bishop of Sokoto, Matthew Kukah, claiming the fiery cleric is “too partisan.”
This comes as he also claimed that Kukah’s views on national issues are “coloured by politics,” and that the pastor should heed the call to shed his cassock and participate in active politics.
In a statement issued on Sunday, Adesina responded to a question posed by Kukah to the President.
Kukah had in the statement asked Buhari if he had fulfilled his “tall dreams of ending banditry and defeating corruption”.
“As you prepare to return to Daura or Kaduna, I do not know if you feel fulfilled or that you met the tall dreams and goals you set for yourself such as: ending banditry, defeating corruption, bringing back our girls, belonging to everybody and belonging to nobody, selling off our presidential fleet and traveling with us,” Kukah had said.
But responding during an interview with Channels Television on Monday, Adesina said the Buhari regime had made progress in the fight against insecurity.
“The figure has been coming down progressively over the years and it’s a fact of history. Nobody can change it,” Adesina said.
“Someone has said it is even better he (Kukah) puts off his cassock and becomes a full-time politician.
“He (Kukah) is rather too partisan. He is someone we had always admired for his intellectual bent.
“But his opinion has been coloured by politics. He talked about selling the presidential fleet. Was that ever promised? In 2015, there were a rash of promises made that even the candidate then did not know about.
“The question is – are we where we were on the issue of banditry in 2015? The job is not fully done but are we where we were?
“If Kukah is true to himself and true to his calling as a cleric he will know that this country is nowhere like it was in terms of banditry as of 2015,” Adesina said.
The presidential spokesman added, “In 2015, we knew where Nigeria was. A minimum of 17 LGAs in this country was under the control of insurgents.
“Talking about control, I mean they were sitting in emirs’ palaces and seats of LGA chairmen. NYSC could not do orientation and post people to those places. Is that what is happening today? No!
“Emirs are back in their palaces. LGA chairmen are back in their offices.
“NYSC orientations are happening in those states and corps members are being posted to those states. Are you now telling me there have been no improvements?”
Discussion about this post