The 2025 Nigeria Governors’ Forum (NGF) summit, which was initially set to be a platform for collaboration among Nigeria’s state leaders, took a dramatic and controversial turn. What began as a gathering meant to promote unity and cooperation soon escalated into a deeply fractured and contentious affair that would expose not only personal rivalries but also the glaring challenges within Nigeria’s political system. The events that unfolded from this meeting not only divided the governors but also reverberated throughout the political landscape of the country, leading to serious questions about the role and effectiveness of the NGF in modern-day governance.
The Political Divisions: Rivers State’s Controversy
One of the first signs that the 2025 NGF meeting would not be a typical session was the heated dispute surrounding the state of emergency declared in Rivers State by President Bola Tinubu. The federal government’s intervention, which led to the suspension of Governor Siminalayi Fubara, was perceived as a political maneuver aimed at quelling instability and addressing growing security concerns in the oil-rich state. However, the decision sparked outrage among many state governors, particularly those from the South-South region, who felt that the move was politically motivated and an overreach of federal power.
The South-South Governors’ Forum, led by Bayelsa State Governor Douye Diri, vehemently opposed the declaration of a state of emergency, viewing it as a direct attack on their political autonomy. On the other hand, governors from Edo and Cross River states expressed support for the federal government’s decision, citing the need to ensure the safety and stability of Rivers State. This divide quickly snowballed into a full-blown conflict at the NGF meeting, with governors from different regions accusing each other of betraying the unity of the forum.
Allegations of Mismanagement: A Crumbling Foundation
While political disagreements over Rivers State were brewing, another storm was gathering within the NGF itself. Allegations of financial mismanagement and internal corruption surfaced, further deepening the rift within the forum. Abdulrazaque Bello-Barkindo, the forum’s Director of Media and Public Affairs, accused the NGF’s Director-General, Asishana Okauru, of diverting funds for personal use and failing to maintain transparency within the forum’s operations.
This accusation was a bombshell, as it raised serious questions about the integrity of the NGF’s leadership and its ability to function as an impartial body. Calls for a forensic audit of the NGF’s finances were made by several members, pointing to a lack of accountability in the forum’s financial dealings. These allegations not only fueled distrust among the governors but also cast a shadow over the forum’s supposed role as a collective voice for state leaders. The absence of clear and transparent governance within the NGF threatened to undermine its legitimacy and weakened its ability to mediate between state and federal interests.
The Clash: A Breakdown of Order
As the 2025 NGF meeting unfolded, the situation grew increasingly heated. What should have been a discussion on pressing national issues descended into an open confrontation between governors, with accusations flying from all sides. The meeting was marked by sharp exchanges, as some governors openly clashed over their differing political ideologies and positions on the state of emergency in Rivers. The South-South governors, in particular, took a strong stance against what they considered federal encroachment on state powers.
At the same time, factions within the NGF began to accuse one another of being more interested in political maneuvering than in working for the collective good of the states. Allegations of manipulation and self-interest began to surface, and it became evident that the NGF was no longer functioning as a unified body. Instead of being a space for constructive dialogue, it had become a battleground for personal and regional political interests.
The Fallout: A Divided Forum and National Implications
The fallout from the 2025 NGF meeting was swift and far-reaching. With no communique issued at the end of the summit, it was clear that the forum had failed to reach any meaningful conclusions or agreements. The inability of the governors to present a unified front sent a message of disarray to the Nigerian public and exposed deep-seated dysfunction within the country’s state leadership.
Beyond the immediate implications for the NGF, the events also had national ramifications. The president’s intervention in Rivers State was scrutinized more closely, and the political ramifications of the state of emergency rippled across the country. The fracture within the NGF signaled a larger crisis within Nigeria’s political system, where the federal and state governments seemed increasingly at odds, rather than working in harmony.
This moment also drew attention to the growing issue of accountability in Nigerian politics. With allegations of financial mismanagement swirling within the NGF, the need for more transparent and ethical governance became a major point of discussion. The NGF’s inability to maintain unity not only discredited its own credibility but also sparked wider debates about the effectiveness of Nigeria’s political structures.
The Road Ahead: Reform or Collapse?
In the aftermath of the 2025 Governors’ Forum, many Nigerians are left wondering whether the NGF can ever recover from this crisis. Calls for reform and greater accountability within the forum have grown louder, with some suggesting that a complete overhaul of the NGF’s leadership structure may be necessary to restore its credibility.
For the governors, the challenge will be to rebuild trust and find a way to bridge the political divides that have become so entrenched. If they fail to do so, the forum risks becoming irrelevant, further diminishing its ability to advocate for the interests of states at the national level.
For now, the 2025 NGF summit stands as a stark reminder of the challenges Nigeria faces in terms of political unity and governance. Whether the governors can mend their fractured relations and restore the NGF to its original purpose remains to be seen, but one thing is clear—the forum’s ability to function effectively has been severely compromised.
Discussion about this post