- Over 150,000 case backlogs persist nationwide, driven by rising legal awareness and a surge in civil and criminal disputes.
- Nigeria faces severe judge and courtroom shortages, leading to overloaded dockets and prolonged adjudication of even straightforward legal matters.
The Nigerian judiciary, often regarded as the cornerstone of justice and the last hope for the common citizen, faces significant challenges due to court congestion and judicial delays.
These issues have contributed to a growing erosion of public confidence in the justice system, as litigants endure prolonged legal processes that often fail to deliver timely resolutions.
This article explores the causes, consequences, and ongoing efforts to address court congestion and judicial delays in Nigeria, drawing on factual data and developments to highlight the scope of the problem.
CAUSES OF COURT CONGESTION AND JUDICIAL DELAYS
Court congestion in Nigeria stems from a combination of systemic inefficiencies and structural challenges.
One primary factor is the overwhelming backlog of cases. In 2018, the Lagos State Chief Judge reported over 3,000 pending cases across state courts, a figure described as alarming.
Nationwide, case backlogs have been estimated to reach as high as 150,000, driven by increasing awareness of legal rights and a growing number of disputes.
Insufficient judicial resources exacerbate the problem. Nigeria faces a shortage of judges, courtrooms, and support staff, leading to overburdened dockets.
Many courts lack adequate infrastructure, such as modern case management systems or sufficient physical space, which hinders efficient case processing.
Additionally, frequent adjournments, often due to unprepared counsel, unmeritorious appeals, or preliminary objections, contribute significantly to delays.
These tactics, sometimes employed to frustrate proceedings, clog the judicial pipeline and prolong case resolution.
Poor coordination among justice sector stakeholders also plays a role.
In 2025, Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Kudirat Kekere-Ekun highlighted how inadequate investigative processes and lack of thorough case preparation by law enforcement agencies lead to prolonged trials and prison congestion.
Incomplete investigations often result in cases being dismissed for lack of evidence, further undermining trust in the system.
CONSEQUENCES OF JUDICIAL DELAYS
The impact of court congestion and delays is profound, affecting both individuals and society at large. For litigants, prolonged trials can lead to significant financial and emotional costs.
Businesses may suffer irreparable economic losses, as commercial disputes linger unresolved for years, sometimes a decade or more.
This inefficiency deters investors, who perceive Nigeria’s judicial system as unreliable for enforcing contracts or resolving disputes, ultimately impacting economic growth.
For ordinary citizens, particularly those awaiting trial, delays can result in extended detention.
A significant percentage of inmates in Nigeria’s custodial centers are pretrial detainees, some spending months or years behind bars due to inefficiencies in the justice system.
Such delays can lead to forgotten evidence or faded witness memories, compromising the quality of justice delivered and, in some cases, resulting in wrongful convictions.
Public confidence in the judiciary is waning as a result. When citizens perceive that justice is delayed or unattainable, trust in the system erodes, fostering cynicism and disillusionment.
In extreme cases, this can lead to a reliance on self-help or extrajudicial measures, threatening societal stability. The perception that wealthier individuals can manipulate the system to expedite their cases while the poor languish further deepens this distrust.
EFFORTS TO ADDRESS THE CRISIS
Recognizing these challenges, the Nigerian judiciary has introduced reforms to improve efficiency.
In August 2024, the Supreme Court implemented new rules introducing electronic filing, virtual hearings, and stricter timelines for case processes.
These measures aim to reduce delays, streamline filings, and enhance accessibility, particularly for litigants in remote areas.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms, such as mediation and arbitration, are gaining traction as faster, less adversarial pathways to justice.
Programs like the Lagos Backlog Elimination Programme, launched in 2018, have sought to decongest courts by resolving older cases through ADR or accelerated hearings.
The CJN has also emphasized the strategic use of ADR to improve judicial efficiency without compromising fairness.
Additionally, the judiciary is working to strengthen coordination with law enforcement and the Ministry of Justice to ensure thorough case preparation and compliance with court orders.
Investments in technology, such as eCourt systems and remote case management, are being prioritized to reduce logistical hurdles and modernize court operations.
Court congestion and judicial delays in Nigeria are complex issues rooted in resource shortages, systemic inefficiencies, and procedural abuses.
These challenges undermine public confidence, deter investment, and disproportionately harm vulnerable citizens.
While reforms like digital transformation, ADR, and improved stakeholder coordination show promise, sustained efforts are needed to restore trust in the judiciary.
By addressing these issues head-on, Nigeria can strengthen its justice system, ensuring timely and fair outcomes for all.
Discussion about this post