Money moved like a river beneath the surface of Nigeria’s banking system, invisible to most but tracked carefully by those who knew where to look. Cryptocurrency transactions rose and fell without notice, flowing through accounts that were meant to be monitored but were left unchecked.
By early 2026, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission had begun piecing together a story of negligence, deliberate gaps, and billions lost to fraud. Each digital transaction became a clue, every pattern a map, leading investigators through a labyrinth of accounts, wallets, and networks that spanned the country.
What appeared as ordinary banking activity concealed an extraordinary flow of illicit funds, and the EFCC followed every trace with patience and precision.
Serious Allegations Against Banks, Fintechs, and Microfinance Banks
In January 2026, EFCC officials publicly accused several Nigerian financial institutions of failing to enforce anti-fraud measures meant to protect customers and the financial system. Know Your Customer and Customer Due Diligence procedures, designed to flag suspicious activity, were either ignored or implemented poorly. New-generation banks, celebrated for their technological sophistication, allowed cryptocurrency transactions to move unchecked, creating blind spots that fraudsters exploited.
Investigators discovered that approximately ₦162 billion worth of cryptocurrency flowed through at least one new-generation bank from January to December 2025 without proper verification. Another ₦18.7 billion was traced to accounts tied to investment and airline discount scams, many of which defrauded ordinary Nigerians. These transactions revealed a mix of institutional oversight failures and deliberate manipulation by fraud networks.
Microfinance banks and fintech operators also featured prominently in the investigation. Accounts with minimal activity suddenly became hubs for high-value transfers. Some institutions did not flag repeated transfers that should have triggered alerts. EFCC analysts noted that these lapses were not isolated but indicative of systemic weaknesses in monitoring and reporting.
The commission emphasized that while some financial institutions claimed technical compliance, the reality was stark. Weak controls, combined with the complexity of crypto and digital payment flows, allowed billions to be moved without detection. Investigators warned that negligence of this magnitude would no longer be tolerated and that institutions could face legal consequences if found complicit.
Impact on Nigerians
The scale of the fraud was devastating. EFCC estimated that more than 900,000 Nigerians were affected by the largest of these schemes, losing savings, investments, and operating capital. One of the most widespread scams involved a fake airline discount system, first appearing in March 2025, which tricked people into transferring funds for tickets that never existed.
Another scheme, which began in April 2025, involved bogus investment companies with elaborate online presences that mimicked legitimate financial institutions. The fraudsters created a veneer of authenticity through professional websites, social media profiles, and official correspondence. Funds were routed through multiple banks and fintech platforms, complicating detection.
The human impact extended beyond financial loss. Families and small businesses faced severe disruption, some unable to meet operational or household obligations. The EFCC’s interviews with victims revealed fear, confusion, and anger. These stories underscored not only the scale of the fraud but the societal consequences of institutional failures.
Investigators also documented patterns in how fraud networks targeted vulnerable populations, particularly those unfamiliar with digital finance or cryptocurrency. The scale and sophistication of the scams illustrated systemic weaknesses in the financial system and highlighted the need for accountability, not only from perpetrators but from the institutions that facilitated these transactions.
How EFCC Traced the ₦162 Billion Crypto Transactions
EFCC investigators approached the ₦162 billion crypto scam as a digital labyrinth, where every transaction held a clue. Using forensic accounting tools and blockchain analysis, the team mapped movements across wallets and bank accounts. By late 2025, they had identified patterns in how the fraudsters moved funds between multiple accounts in both Nigerian banks and foreign digital wallets, breaking down large sums into smaller transfers to avoid triggering alarms.
Investigators looked for sequences in transaction timings, account usage, and wallet conversions. Repeated patterns emerged, revealing how dormant accounts were suddenly activated for high-value transfers. EFCC analysts noted that some accounts received multiple small deposits from unrelated individuals, which were then aggregated into cryptocurrency transactions. This method demonstrated both sophistication and intentional design by the fraudsters.
The commission also leveraged interbank cooperation. Some banks voluntarily shared transaction histories, while others resisted, fearing reputational damage. Each lead was verified against blockchain records, KYC documentation, and transaction logs. Analysts painstakingly reconstructed every major transfer sequence, connecting the digital footprints of funds to the original fraudulent schemes.
EFCC combined technology and human intelligence. Software flagged suspicious transfers, but analysts reviewed them manually to avoid false positives. Cross-referencing blockchain addresses with bank accounts revealed how the flow of ₦162 billion traversed multiple layers of financial institutions. This methodology allowed the EFCC to create a full map of the fraud network and pinpoint institutional lapses that enabled the illicit movement of funds.
Collaboration with Regulatory Bodies
EFCC coordinated closely with the Central Bank of Nigeria, the Financial Reporting Council, and other supervisory agencies. Regulators were tasked with verifying compliance, auditing suspicious accounts, and determining whether banks and fintechs had violated operational standards. This collaboration ensured no institution could evade scrutiny through bureaucratic loopholes.
Joint investigations involved cross-checking transaction records, assessing internal audit reports, and monitoring real-time transfers. Regulators contributed both oversight expertise and legal authority, allowing EFCC to act decisively. This multi-agency approach underscored the seriousness of the case and demonstrated a commitment to addressing systemic vulnerabilities across Nigeria’s financial sector.
The CBN, in particular, was asked to review licensing conditions and operational protocols for banks implicated in large crypto transfers. Officials examined whether financial institutions had adequate staff training, risk management frameworks, and automated fraud detection systems in place. The goal was to prevent similar multi-billion Naira scams in the future and restore public trust in the banking system.
The collaboration also included public communication. Both EFCC and regulatory bodies informed the public about ongoing investigations, emphasizing the importance of vigilance and compliance. By combining enforcement, oversight, and transparency, Nigerian authorities sought to mitigate the human, economic, and institutional costs of large-scale fraud.
Institutional Failures and Compliance Gaps
Investigators found that many institutions failed to implement KYC and CDD protocols rigorously. Accounts were opened without sufficient verification of identity or source of funds, creating opportunities for fraudsters. Transactions flagged as unusual were often ignored or delayed, allowing illicit funds to move freely.
Fintech platforms offering digital wallets or cryptocurrency services were particularly vulnerable. Lax onboarding processes and insufficient monitoring allowed fraudsters to exploit the system, sometimes layering transactions through multiple accounts to obscure the origin of funds. These gaps magnified the impact of scams, amplifying losses across the banking sector.
The EFCC emphasized that systemic weaknesses went beyond individual lapses. Even banks with strong compliance frameworks had gaps in monitoring, reporting, or escalation procedures. Investigators highlighted that technology alone was insufficient; institutional vigilance and accountability were critical to prevent large-scale financial crimes.
Recommendations included mandatory real-time monitoring of suspicious activity, regular audits, and staff training on emerging fraud patterns. EFCC officials stressed that the lessons from the ₦162 billion crypto scam and the ₦18.7 billion investment and airline discount scams should guide reform across Nigeria’s financial sector, making institutions resilient rather than complicit.
Recovery Efforts and Legal Proceedings
EFCC launched parallel recovery operations alongside investigations. The commission sought to freeze accounts linked to fraudulent activity, trace cryptocurrency wallets, and recover funds where possible. Recovery efforts involved coordination with banks, fintechs, and, in some cases, foreign financial institutions.
Legal proceedings were prepared against institutions and individuals found complicit in facilitating or failing to report suspicious transactions. EFCC emphasized that criminal prosecution could include both executives and operational staff responsible for compliance failures. These proceedings aimed to send a clear message that financial negligence in the face of multi-billion Naira fraud would not be tolerated.
The commission also engaged with victims, providing guidance on reporting losses and cooperating with ongoing investigations. Public awareness campaigns highlighted the risks of digital investment schemes and the importance of verifying financial platforms before transferring funds. This dual approach of enforcement and education was critical to restore public confidence.
EFCC made clear that recovery was not only about funds but about accountability. By combining legal, technical, and investigative strategies, the commission aimed to prevent repeat occurrences, recover lost assets, and ensure that financial institutions strengthened safeguards to protect ordinary Nigerians.
The Role of Banks and Fintechs in Enabling the Fraud
Financial institutions, both traditional and digital, were central to the flow of illicit funds. Investigators found that lapses in KYC procedures allowed accounts to be opened with minimal verification. This enabled fraudsters to move substantial sums without triggering alerts. New-generation banks, despite advanced technology, had weaknesses in monitoring crypto-related transfers, while smaller fintechs lacked rigorous compliance protocols.
Microfinance banks were implicated in several smaller transactions that were aggregated into the larger scheme. EFCC observed that accounts opened for ordinary business purposes were exploited to funnel money through cryptocurrency conversions. These transfers often bypassed standard fraud detection algorithms, revealing both systemic and operational gaps.
The EFCC emphasized that banks were not passive bystanders. Some failed to escalate unusual activity, while others delayed reporting suspicious transactions. This negligence created opportunities for fraudsters to exploit the system repeatedly. The commission suggested that the magnitude of losses could have been reduced if financial institutions had enforced compliance standards consistently.
Regulators were urged to consider institutional accountability alongside individual culpability. The commission noted that the vulnerabilities were not limited to one bank or fintech but spanned the industry. Strengthening controls, enforcing reporting standards, and maintaining active oversight were essential to prevent future large-scale fraud, as highlighted by the ₦162 billion case.
Case Study: The Airline Discount Scam
One of the most visible schemes involved a fake airline ticket discount platform, first reported by victims in March 2025. The platform promised significant reductions on domestic and international flights, luring individuals and businesses into transferring funds to accounts controlled by the fraudsters. Investigators traced the movement of funds through multiple banks, ultimately linking the transactions to cryptocurrency wallets.
Victims often believed they were participating in legitimate promotions. The scammers used professional-looking websites, emails, and social media outreach to maintain credibility. EFCC analysts noted that the platform appeared active for several months, moving substantial sums without raising red flags in the financial system.
Banks implicated in this scheme had failed to flag multiple large transfers over consecutive weeks. Investigators determined that better compliance checks and early detection could have prevented millions of Naira in losses. The airline scam demonstrated how traditional scams could be amplified through modern banking and digital finance channels.
The case also illustrated the human impact of fraud. Hundreds of families and small businesses reported financial losses, delayed travel plans, and disrupted operations. EFCC emphasized that tracing these transactions and holding institutions accountable was essential to restoring public trust in Nigeria’s banking and fintech sectors.
Case Study: The Bogus Investment Scheme
Another high-profile scam involved a network of fake investment companies that emerged in April 2025. These firms offered returns higher than market averages and used websites, social media profiles, and professional correspondence to appear legitimate. Investors transferred funds to accounts linked to the companies, which were then converted into cryptocurrency and moved through multiple banks.
EFCC traced the flow of funds step by step, identifying accounts that acted as intermediaries between victims and cryptocurrency exchanges. The investigators discovered that the fraudulent network operated across several states in Nigeria, exploiting gaps in institutional oversight. Many of the companies had minimal operational presence beyond their online facade, making them difficult to detect until the fraud reached massive proportions.
Financial institutions allowed transfers to occur without adequate verification, while some fintech platforms failed to flag high-risk activity. EFCC analysts highlighted that repeated transaction monitoring, enhanced KYC procedures, and real-time alerts could have mitigated the impact. This case became central to understanding how institutional lapses compounded financial crimes.
The bogus investment scheme also reflected the sophistication of modern fraud in Nigeria. By combining digital tools, online marketing, and institutional vulnerabilities, perpetrators executed multi-billion Naira scams with precision. EFCC’s tracing efforts revealed both the human and systemic dimensions of these operations, underscoring the need for comprehensive reform.
The Human Cost of Multi-Billion Fraud
EFCC emphasized that the largest scams had real-world consequences for hundreds of thousands of Nigerians. Victims ranged from small-scale investors to businesses relying on digital finance for operations. The ₦162 billion cryptocurrency scam alone affected over 900,000 people, creating ripple effects across the economy.
Many victims reported losing savings accumulated over years. Others faced disruptions to business operations, delayed investments, and loss of trust in financial institutions. The human cost extended beyond immediate monetary losses, affecting livelihoods, morale, and confidence in digital finance.
The commission conducted interviews and collected statements from affected individuals between October 2025 and January 2026. These accounts revealed patterns of emotional distress, financial instability, and frustration with institutions that failed to protect them. EFCC highlighted that addressing systemic vulnerabilities was not only about preventing fraud but safeguarding citizens’ economic security.
The human dimension reinforced the urgency of institutional accountability. EFCC argued that banks and fintechs had a societal responsibility to prevent fraud, protect funds, and maintain public trust. The commission’s ongoing investigations were aimed not just at recovery but also at creating deterrents that could reduce future financial and human harm.
Lessons for Nigerian Banks and Fintechs
The ₦162 billion crypto scam exposed vulnerabilities across the Nigerian financial ecosystem. Banks and fintechs were reminded that compliance was not optional but central to maintaining trust and operational integrity. Lapses in KYC, CDD, and reporting procedures created fertile ground for fraud and systemic risk.
Institutions were urged to implement real-time monitoring systems, regular audits, and staff training focused on emerging financial crimes. The EFCC highlighted that proactive oversight could prevent millions in losses, protect the public, and preserve confidence in digital and traditional banking services.
Collaboration with regulators was identified as a key component of effective risk management. Sharing information, responding promptly to flagged transactions, and ensuring compliance with supervisory directives became essential to reduce exposure to fraud. EFCC recommended that all institutions review their policies in light of the crypto and investment scams revealed in 2025 and early 2026.
Finally, Nigerian banks and fintechs were reminded of their societal responsibility. Beyond regulatory obligations, they play a crucial role in safeguarding the economy and the welfare of citizens. Lessons learned from these multi-billion Naira scams must drive reform, innovation, and vigilance across the sector, making it impossible for fraudsters to exploit gaps unchecked.
Discussion about this post